The global on-demand healthcare market was valued at approximately USD 135.57 billion in 2024 and is projected to climb to roughly USD 725.28 billion by 2034, translating into a compound annual growth rate of 18.5% across the period from 2025 to 2034.
The rapid digital transformation now reshaping healthcare is driven by telemedicine, mHealth apps, wearables, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing, each delivering real-time care beyond clinic walls. Together, these tools let doctors hold virtual visits, track patients at home, and rely on cloud-hosted algorithms to guide clinical choices, so assistance reaches people whenever and wherever it is needed. AI is rapidly becoming a clinical partner: 90% of healthcare organizations are allocating resources toward AI in diagnostics and patient care, with 69% of hospitals having adopted or planning to adopt AI-based diagnostic tools. For instance, smart wristbands paired with a mobile phone send heart rates and step counts straight to a physician, allowing steady oversight of long-term issues such as diabetes or high blood pressure. Complementing this, algorithm-backed screening bots and virtual triage line managers speed up diagnosis, keep patients involved, and in turn ease overcrowding in emergency rooms and inpatient wards. A marked shift toward on-demand, consumer-oriented care is driving rapid growth in the healthcare market. Patients now expect the same ease and immediacy in receiving care that they enjoy from retail, banking, or travel applications.
What is on-demand healthcare?
This persistent upward trend illustrates a clear consumer shift toward swift, user-friendly healthcare interactions that seamlessly integrate into hectic routines. Smartphone ubiquity and high-speed connectivity make on-demand paradigms possible, enabling virtual visits, ongoing remote surveillance, digital pharmacies, and at-home diagnostics, all orchestrated through mobile applications or web-based gateways. Rising smartphone adoption, growing willingness to engage with telehealth, and the escalating prevalence of chronic diseases jointly accelerate the momentum. Stakeholders—patients, providers, insurers, and employers—are all indispensable, yet the framework reorients the patient-provider dynamic to favor ongoing, instantaneous dialogue. By bringing care to remote and historically underserved locales, the model trims costs, reduces appointment backlogs, and expands the health system’s overall throughput.
Report Scope
Area of Focus | Details |
Market Size in 2025 | USD 160.32 Billion |
Expected Market Size in 2034 | USD 725.28 Billion |
Projected CAGR 2025 to 2034 | 18.50% |
Dominant Region | North America |
Fastest Growing Region | Asia-Pacific |
Key Segment | Mode of Service, Platform, Component, Technology, Deployment, Mode, End User, Region |
Key Companies | Teladoc Health, Inc., Amwell (American Well Corporation), MDLIVE, Inc., Doctor on Demand, Inc., HealthTap, Inc., Babylon Health, PlushCare, Inc., Ping An Good Doctor, Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd., 1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Tata 1mg), Zocdoc, Inc, Oscar Health, Inc., Medici Technologies, LLC |
Mobile-based Platforms: Mobile apps propel this convergence because smartphones are ubiquitous, intuitive interfaces keep users engaged, and push features drive daily interaction. Through a single dashboard, patients can launch video visits, book clinics, retrieve e-prescriptions, log workouts, and settle bills. As Teladoc stated, 62% of its consultations in 2024 stemmed from mobile devices. In India and Southeast Asia, Practo serves more than 100 million users every year. Flexible, real-time access, supplemented by alerts and adherence nudges, explains why urban consumers worldwide are rapidly embracing the mobile health paradigm.
Web-based platforms: Despite the rise of mobile apps, web-based platforms continue to play an indispensable role, particularly for large organizations and users who prefer a desktop setup. Hospitals, outpatient clinics, and managed-care systems typically choose browser-based portals to coordinate virtual visits, link electronic health records, and settle insurance claims. In the US, 82% of hospitals reported using web-based patient portals for the exchange of health information and care coordination, based on a report from the ONC for Health IT. The larger display accommodates complex information, making it easier to conduct lengthy examinations or switch between multiple patient files without losing context.
Real-time: Real-time services-meaning live video, voice, or chat sessions-represent the signature on-demand model, allowing patients and clinicians to exchange information in real time. This immediacy suits a wide range of scenarios, including urgent-care visits, routine primary checks, mental-health assessments, and post-procedure follow-ups.
Store-and-forward services: The store-and-forward model permits regional clinics or individual patients to transmit images, laboratory results, and textual summaries to a remote specialist, who subsequently reviews the uploaded material at a convenient time. Specialties such as dermatology, radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology have integrated the architecture, recognising its capacity to improve workflow. In the US, over 40 states have store and forward systems reimbursed for at least one specialty, while in Australia’s national telehealth program, store and forward makes up nearly 30% of the dermatology consultations, shortening the waiting period from weeks to days. By removing the synchronous requirement of patient and specialist presence, the model enables consultations scheduled during evenings, facilitates international referral pathways, and permits careful, non-urgent second opinions, thus smoothing demand across time zones.
Remote monitoring: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has emerged as a vital tool in managing chronic disease, allowing clinicians to track heart rate, oxygen levels, glucose, or blood pressure from afar. Wearable gadgets and Internet-linked sensors gather this information, sending it to care teams for immediate review. In the U.S., Medicare data indicates that RPM programs have decreased hospital readmission rates for heart failure patients by as much as 25%. In addition, diabetes management programs that utilize continuous glucose monitoring systems have reduced hypoglycemia by as much as 60%. Major implementations, like the RPM network of the Veterans Health Administration, which monitors over seventy thousand patients each year, have reduced hospital costs by $1,600 per patient annually.
Individuals: Individuals represent the largest and fastest-growing group using RPM, a shift fueled by the quest for low-cost, convenient care. Many people want health services that work around-the-clock, whether they are seeking help for a chronic illness, a sudden anxiety episode, or a routine check-up. To illustrate, Livongo reports that over 80% of patients using their diabetes control platform improve glucose control within six months. Not only do these tools empower patients to take charge of their health, but they also make a tangible difference—for example, a 15–20% drop in ER visits for chronic disease patients on RPM tools. It is clear why this segment is expected to dominate the market in coming years.
Providers: Hospitals, primary-care clinics, and private practitioners are now using on-demand digital services to reach more patients, conserve staff time, and provide care from home. When telehealth is stitched into room-scheduling, EHRs, and lab networks, clinics cut wait queues, keep treatment plans in one flow, and boost care quality, especially in rural and low-resource zip codes. Virtual consultations that are integrated into NHS hospital IT systems have, to this date, saved approximately 1.2 million staff hours per year in the UK. Meanwhile, eSanjeevani, India’s national telemedicine service, has enabled over 150 million consultations.
Payers: Insurers, or payers, back on-demand care as a way to ease claims costs, steer low-acuity cases away from crowded ERs, and lift member loyalty. A growing number of health plans sponsor virtual-visit apps, paired remote monitoring kits, and year-round wellness nudges as part of the benefits wallet.
Employers: Employers have become a key, and strategic, buyer in the on-demand picture. To keep workers healthy and curb sick days, many firms fold virtual mental-health portals and urgent-care chat lines into broader wellness menus. The trend is strongest in mid-sized to large employers, with rapid adoption seen in tech, financial services, and life-science sectors.
Smartphones are becoming prevalent throughout the Asia-Pacific region, which is experiencing the strongest and fastest growth for on-demand healthcare services, expanding at a compound annual growth rate of over 18% from 2025 to 2034. This growth is aided by a flooding middle class as well as government digitization efforts toward health initiatives. In India, services such as Practo, Tata Health, and 1mg are broadening teleconsultations and at-home lab tests, while the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) creates the national infrastructure to further digitize care. China s market is equally robust, propelled by Ping An Good Doctor, WeDoctor, and similar platforms, all backed by strong public-private funding and a dynamic regulatory landscape.
The global on-demand healthcare market is led by North America, and more specifically, the United States which generated more than 40% of revenues worldwide in 2024. This is driven by a well-established healthcare system, a smartphone and high-speed internet penetration rate beyond 95%, and healthcare market leaders, Teladoc Health, Amwell and MDLIVE, which together account for over 25 million virtual visits in a year, and are used by more than 75 million people. Major federal policies-HITECH, the telehealth expansions of the CARES Act-have carried virtual care from pilot to mainstream in a few years. Canada is also moving forward, with provincial authorities rolling out virtual-health programs that reach both urban centers and remote regions.
Europe has entered a consolidation phase, driven by an ageing population and a mounting prevalence of chronic conditions. Due to Europe’s population aging, with more than a 20% share of population aged 65 and over, coupled with the rise in the prevalence of chronic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, Europe is moving into a consolidation phase for on-demand healthcare. The United Kingdom, Germany, France, and the Nordic nations lead eHealth uptake, each pursuing tailored national programmes. These local efforts receive backing from the European Commission’s Digital Health Strategy and the General Data Protection Regulation, which jointly offer a secure and interoperable environment. Nevertheless, divergent regulatory frameworks among member states continue to obstruct the widescale, cross-border deployment of telehealth services throughout the continent.
Consumption of on-demand healthcare in Latin America is still patchy but is evolving swiftly, with Brazil and Mexico leading the charge. They accounted for over 60% of the region’s telemedicine revenue in 2024. Virtual consultations are accessible to millions of citizens due to Brazil’s Conecte SUS platform and Mexico’s Salud Digital initiative. Moreover, chronic disease management is becoming much more affordable thanks to startups like Doctoralia and Clivi. In response, neighbourhood startups and public-sector programs are accelerating projects meant to broaden access to virtual appointments. The Middle East and Africa sit at an earlier stage overall, though urban hubs reveal considerable latent demand. In the Gulf Cooperation Council, for instance, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia allocate sizable resources to digital-health infrastructure within larger national transformation blueprints. By contrast, many sub-Saharan communities confront limited internet access and high-service costs, yet simple mobile-based models are being tested as cost-effective bridges.
Market Segmentation
By Mode of Service
By Platform
By Component
By Technology
By Deployment
By Mode
By End User
By Region
Chapter 1. Market Introduction and Overview
1.1 Market Definition and Scope
1.1.1 Overview of On-Demand Healthcare
1.1.2 Scope of the Study
1.1.3 Research Timeframe
1.2 Research Methodology and Approach
1.2.1 Methodology Overview
1.2.2 Data Sources and Validation
1.2.3 Key Assumptions and Limitations
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
2.1 Market Highlights and Snapshot
2.2 Key Insights by Segments
2.2.1 By Mode of Service Overview
2.2.2 By Platform Overview
2.2.3 By Component Overview
2.2.4 By Technology Overview
2.2.5 By Deployment Overview
2.2.6 By Mode Overview
2.2.7 By End User Overview
2.3 Competitive Overview
Chapter 3. Global Impact Analysis
3.1 Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Global Market Implications
3.2 Regulatory and Policy Changes Impacting Global Markets
Chapter 4. Market Dynamics and Trends
4.1 Market Dynamics
4.1.1 Market Drivers
4.1.1.1 The rising burden of chronic diseases coupled with aging populations
4.1.1.2 Strong investments and policy support from governments
4.1.2 Market Restraints
4.1.2.1 Regulatory and data privacy challenges
4.1.2.2 Limited digital infrastructure in emerging and rural regions
4.1.3 Market Challenges
4.1.3.1 Maintaining the quality, safety, and accuracy of remote healthcare services
4.1.3.2 Sustainability of the business models and operational strain on healthcare professionals
4.1.4 Market Opportunities
4.1.4.1 Fully integrated digital care platforms
4.1.4.2 Targeting specialized and underserved segments
4.2 Market Trends
Chapter 5. Premium Insights and Analysis
5.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Dynamics, Impact Analysis
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.2.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
5.2.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
5.2.3 Threat of Substitute Products
5.2.4 Rivalry among Existing Firms
5.2.5 Threat of New Entrants
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Value Chain Analysis
5.5 Product Pricing Analysis
5.6 Vendor Landscape
5.6.1 List of Buyers
5.6.2 List of Suppliers
Chapter 6. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Mode of Service
6.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Mode of Service
6.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
6.1.1.1 Real-time Services
6.1.1.2 Store-and-Forward
6.1.1.3 Remote Monitoring
Chapter 7. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Platform
7.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Platform
7.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
7.1.1.1 Mobile Applications
7.1.1.2 Web-based Platforms
Chapter 8. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Component
8.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Component
8.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
8.1.1.1 Hardware
8.1.1.2 Software
8.1.1.3 Services
Chapter 9. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Technology
9.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Technology
9.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
9.1.1.1 Blockchain
9.1.1.2 Artificial Intelligence
9.1.1.3 Machine Learning
9.1.1.4 Internet of Things
9.1.1.5 Cloud Computing
9.1.1.6 Big Data Analytics
Chapter 10. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Deployment
10.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Deployment
10.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
10.1.1.1 On-Premise
10.1.1.2 Cloud-Based
10.1.1.3 Hybrid
Chapter 11. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Mode
11.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By Mode
11.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
11.1.1.1 B2B
11.1.1.2 B2C
Chapter 12. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By End-User
12.1 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market Snapshot, By End-User
12.1.1 Market Revenue (($Billion) and Growth Rate (%), 2022-2034
12.1.1.1 Individuals
12.1.1.2 Providers
12.1.1.3 Payers
12.1.1.4 Employers
Chapter 13. On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Region
13.1 Overview
13.2 On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue Share, By Region 2024 (%)
13.3 Global On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Region
13.3.1 Market Size and Forecast
13.4 North America
13.4.1 North America On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.4.3 North America On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Country
13.4.4 U.S.
13.4.4.1 U.S. On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.4.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.4.4.3 U.S. Market Segmental Analysis
13.4.5 Canada
13.4.5.1 Canada On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.4.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.4.5.3 Canada Market Segmental Analysis
13.4.6 Mexico
13.4.6.1 Mexico On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.4.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.4.6.3 Mexico Market Segmental Analysis
13.5 Europe
13.5.1 Europe On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.5.3 Europe On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Country
13.5.4 UK
13.5.4.1 UK On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.5.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.5.4.3 UKMarket Segmental Analysis
13.5.5 France
13.5.5.1 France On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.5.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.5.5.3 FranceMarket Segmental Analysis
13.5.6 Germany
13.5.6.1 Germany On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.5.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.5.6.3 GermanyMarket Segmental Analysis
13.5.7 Rest of Europe
13.5.7.1 Rest of Europe On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.5.7.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.5.7.3 Rest of EuropeMarket Segmental Analysis
13.6 Asia Pacific
13.6.1 Asia Pacific On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.3 Asia Pacific On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Country
13.6.4 China
13.6.4.1 China On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.4.3 ChinaMarket Segmental Analysis
13.6.5 Japan
13.6.5.1 Japan On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.5.3 JapanMarket Segmental Analysis
13.6.6 India
13.6.6.1 India On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.6.3 IndiaMarket Segmental Analysis
13.6.7 Australia
13.6.7.1 Australia On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.7.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.7.3 AustraliaMarket Segmental Analysis
13.6.8 Rest of Asia Pacific
13.6.8.1 Rest of Asia Pacific On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.6.8.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.6.8.3 Rest of Asia PacificMarket Segmental Analysis
13.7 LAMEA
13.7.1 LAMEA On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.7.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.7.3 LAMEA On-Demand Healthcare Market, By Country
13.7.4 GCC
13.7.4.1 GCC On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.7.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.7.4.3 GCCMarket Segmental Analysis
13.7.5 Africa
13.7.5.1 Africa On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.7.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.7.5.3 AfricaMarket Segmental Analysis
13.7.6 Brazil
13.7.6.1 Brazil On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.7.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.7.6.3 BrazilMarket Segmental Analysis
13.7.7 Rest of LAMEA
13.7.7.1 Rest of LAMEA On-Demand Healthcare Market Revenue, 2022-2034 ($Billion)
13.7.7.2 Market Size and Forecast
13.7.7.3 Rest of LAMEAMarket Segmental Analysis
Chapter 14. Competitive Landscape
14.1 Competitor Strategic Analysis
14.1.1 Top Player Positioning/Market Share Analysis
14.1.2 Top Winning Strategies, By Company, 2022-2024
14.1.3 Competitive Analysis By Revenue, 2022-2024
14.2 Recent Developments by the Market Contributors (2024)
Chapter 15. Company Profiles
15.1 Teladoc Health, Inc.
15.1.1 Company Snapshot
15.1.2 Company and Business Overview
15.1.3 Financial KPIs
15.1.4 Product/Service Portfolio
15.1.5 Strategic Growth
15.1.6 Global Footprints
15.1.7 Recent Development
15.1.8 SWOT Analysis
15.2 Amwell (American Well Corporation)
15.3 MDLIVE, Inc.
15.4 Doctor on Demand, Inc.
15.5 HealthTap, Inc.
15.6 Babylon Health
15.7 PlushCare, Inc.
15.8 Ping An Good Doctor
15.9 Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
15.10 1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Tata 1mg)
15.11 Zocdoc, Inc
15.12 Oscar Health, Inc.
15.13 Medici Technologies, LLC